and Events]||[Debate Overview]|
"Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention?"Curiously absent from Scientific American's defense is any mention of David Jones (a chemist and Nature columnist) or of his criticisms. Their original story devoted over a column to his "pointed critique," the only published argument against nanotechnology that they found worth citing. In this round, Scientific American asserts that certain other scientists "can muster technical arguments" to defend this position (note Drexler's response), but the name and arguments of their previous champion have been quietly dropped.
"To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time."
"The dog did nothing in the night-time."
"That was the curious incident," remarked Sherlock Holmes.
|For ongoing nanotechnology|
information, Register for a
|To help prepare|
|Make a Donation to Support Foresight|
play a key role|
in Foresight's efforts
|Become a Senior Associate|